Fail Fast, Thrive Faster: Embracing a New Paradigm for Success

As we step into the new year, where possibilities for growth and transformation abound, it's imperative to reconsider our stance on failure.


Failure has long been viewed as an adversary to be defeated at all costs. The prevailing wisdom, echoed by many executives, is that failure is inherently bad and that learning from it is a straightforward process. However, according to Amy C. Edmondson, a professor at Harvard Business School, this common perspective is fundamentally flawed. In her insightful article, Edmondson challenges the conventional beliefs surrounding failure and argues for a paradigm shift in how organisations approach and learn from their missteps.

The Complexity of Failure

Edmondson draws attention to the fact that failure is not a monolithic concept; it comes in various forms, each requiring a nuanced understanding. She identifies three broad categories of failure:

  • Preventable Failures in Predictable Operations: These failures often result from deviations in well-defined, routine processes. They are considered "bad" and can be addressed through proper training and support.
  • Unavoidable Failures in Complex Systems: In complex environments where uncertainty is inherent, failure is not necessarily negative. Small process failures are inevitable and must be rapidly identified and corrected to prevent larger, consequential failures.
  • Intelligent Failures at the Frontier: Failures that occur during experimentation and innovation are seen as "good." They provide valuable knowledge that can propel an organisation ahead, especially when answers are not known in advance.

Edmondson contends that viewing failure solely through a negative lens is counterproductive and that a sophisticated understanding of its causes and contexts is crucial.


The Blame Game Dilemma

One major obstacle to learning from failure is the pervasive association of failure with blame. From early childhood, individuals are conditioned to equate admitting failure with taking the blame. Edmondson explores how this mindset permeates organisations, hindering the development of a culture of psychological safety where the true lessons of failure can be gleaned.


The author acknowledges the dilemma faced by executives: How can failures be addressed constructively without fostering a laissez-faire attitude? Edmondson argues for a middle ground where a culture of psychological safety coexists with high-performance standards. By distinguishing between blameworthy and non-blameworthy actions and fostering an environment that encourages open dialogue about failures, organisations can overcome the blame game hurdle.


Building a Learning Culture

Edmondson emphasises that leaders play a pivotal role in creating a culture that promotes learning from failure. They need to shift the focus from assigning blame to understanding what happens when things go wrong. Leaders should encourage the reporting of failures, both small and large, and actively seek opportunities for experimentation.


To build a psychologically safe environment, leaders must:

  • Recognise failure is not always bad.
  • Foster an environment where failures can be openly discussed without fear of blame.
  • Communicate the nature of the work, emphasising the value of learning from failure.


The article also outlines three essential activities for effective learning from failure:

  • Detecting Failure: Organisations must actively surface failures, both big and small, early in their development to prevent them from escalating into disasters. Methods such as Total Quality Management and customer feedback are highlighted as tools for detecting failures.
  • Analysing Failure: Once a failure is detected, organisations need to delve beyond superficial reasons and conduct in-depth analyses to understand root causes. This requires a commitment to sophisticated analysis and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths.
  • Promoting Experimentation: Organisations should strategically generate failures through systematic experimentation, especially in areas that require innovation. Embracing failure as an inherent part of experimentation is crucial for extracting valuable insights.


A New Paradigm for Success

Edmondson challenges organisations to replace the fear of failure with a new paradigm—one that acknowledges the inevitability of failure in complex work environments. She argues that those who learn from failure before others will thrive, while those mired in the blame game will stagnate.


Are you ready to transform your approach to failure and propel it towards innovation and growth?

As you navigate the complexities of failure—from preventable mishaps to intelligent experimentation—consider coaching as your strategic guide. As we enter another year, it's the perfect time to break free from the blame game, foster a learning culture, and embrace failure as the catalyst for success.


References:

Edmondson, A. C. (2011, April). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2011/04/strategies-for-learning-from-failure

Newsletter

Get exclusive stories, fresh insights and tips from Clarissa, plus podcast highlights, new tools, upcoming workshops, special offers, and more.

© 2025 Clardoon Coaching